Tuesday 18 December 2012

2. Description of experiments for an energy device like that of Tesla.

We suggest here mainly as modern experiment based on the experiments and findings of Tesla, that of professor Konstantin Meyl

1) MINIATURE TESLA TOWERS TO MEASURE "FREE-ENERGY" of the electromagnetic  SCALAR WAVES. 
In the link  below, professor Konstantin Meyl describes in detail simple experimental setting of miniature Tesla towers in University laboratory, so as to measure beyond doubt the free-energy. He also proves the existence of scalar (non-vector or non-Herz) ) waves of the electromagnetised aether (I assume them to be scalar waves of the scalar electromagnetic potential) . In neutral aether, such waves would be the aether sound compression waves (travelling of course at the speed around that of  light, or in cases that molecular mater is present maybe faster than light).




This professor has published papers, and books about his findings, and has developped his own unified-field theory. And what is also practical, he has designed and sells, experimental kits (for about 300 euros) of miniatures of the Tesla-towers, where he measures in the receiver tower 4 times more power (in milli-volts), as "free energy". 

Hos publications and kit can be found in the above link. 
2) The Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) is an open source project to construct and install a free-energy generator.  It is an adoption of an old 1894 patent by Tesla, for an electric generator. 
The blue prints 
parts and tools


3) As a 3rd example of Tesla-like experiments, we might like to investigate the findings of Kapanatze, that are not irrelevant to the experiments of Tesla. 
B) The next set of instructions is taken mainly from the experimental work of the laboratory of Jean Louis Naudin. (http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/index.htm) and in particular version 3.2 and 3.3.
The suggested design and construction below is quite different I think from the original design in the patent of T. Kapanadze which can be found here
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2008103130A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=20080828&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP
We must notice in advance, that the present realization v3.3 of the Kapanadze device, by Jean Louis Naudin, is so  that the device fails , in the sense, that it does not give more power, that the given input power. But this is not what Kapanadze did. I only give the details of v3.3 realization by J.L. Naudin, because I know of no other very detailed data of realization that did succeed (except perhaps the next video by Andre Fabrice  , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6hVasVR7AI   and more material here  http://pesn.com/2013/04/13/9602295_Demos_by_Fabrice-Andre_Refuge7/ ) . Nevertheless, as J.L. Naudin has published in the same page, of his site, some of the experimenters claim that they did get more output power than the input power. E.g.  the exprimenter Robert below, ( # 10 - June 21, 2010),  did succeed, to have more power at the output (1800W) relative to the input power (800W). But this only after persisting experimentation,  after changing the diode with another, and his coil too has three parts of different number of turns (22-84-6)  that the current version v3.3. It seems also that the experimenter  Romerouk (# 3 - June 10, 2010 - Kapagen replication v1.1 and 1.2 ) did succeed to have more  output power that input power. 

 Another important remark is that the instructions of J.L. Naudin , in his site do not specify explicitly the clockwise or counterclockwise winding of the three or two parts of the coils, and the placing of them on the tube. But even if he did we know that he failed to get more power as  output than as  input. The next video is from an amateur who does carefully specifies, the directions of the turns of the three coils and gives also a slightly different circuit diagram.  

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVfW1yUqTo

 In all videos that I am aware that have successfully realized a Kapagen-like device, where they get more power as output than as input, do utilize three coils in the cylinder configuration of coils and not only two. The circuit connections of the last video above, are claimed by the amateur that are the only that make it work, and not have the coils cancel out the their effects. 
The circuit of this last amateur is shown also here 
http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/1791/imageknr.jpg



We may notice that according to the orientations clockwise/counterclockwise on the geometry of the three coils, and after the circuit connections that the previous amateur  proposes with a grounding connected in between the three coils, it seems as if he is having the next configuration:  a transformer, that in its primary part (coils 22 turns/84 turns) it is given a high voltage non-DC current, and so that the secondary part (coil 6 or 9 turns) gives the output current with extra energy, and both primary and secondary have a common pole in the grounding. The above configuration is so that there are two non-equal magnetic fields from the coils with opposite (repelling) position of their north and south poles. Such a configuration of magnetic fields is almost identical the the magnetic fields of the two wheels of the old overunity device of testatika (in the community of Methernitha). (See post 1)
So my suggestion is , to start with the details of J.L. Naudin that we know that he failed, utilize three coils and not two coils and then experiment with different circuit connections as the above amateur.

The Kapagen-related method by Andre Fabrice as in 
deviates much more that the details of J.L. Naudin.
All informations and diagrams are published freely (freeware) and are intended for a private use and a non commercial use.
Warning!
Due to the presence of High Voltage and the High Power output of the Kapagen, users of this document should be very carefull and experienced in High-Voltage electronics to try anything out ! If you do it, the risk of any result is just yours. I take no responsibility of anything that might happen.
Testing such a device needs a lot of caution and the use of safety procedures, the experimenter must be very skilled in the use of High Voltage at High Power...



The main circuit

The double coil
The diode HV 05-12  F04 (Later constructors have experimented with different diodes, so that the diode   remains cool)
The spark gap ( air gap 0.9 mm) (Both rods of the spark gap from tungsten. Later constructors have put the one rod of the spark gap from copper and the other from carbon, which makes the spark gap silent during discharges, and reduces input power by 55 watts)
The capacitor HV 1μF 2000V AC
The resistance  10 M Ohms  Internal (1 W )

In the above circuit circulates about 2000 Volts AC. 


Here is the diagram of the main circuit.




This main cicuit is creating a pulsating electric current because of the spark gap, the capacitor, the resistance, the diode and the induced current from the input power trasnformer (not seen in this part of the circuit).

The beneficial energy job is done from the double coil that you see in the diagram. It is not a transformer, and to many may seem like a grounded antenna. 
Some conjectural theory:
What it does, according to my understanding is to create an asymmetric (conical) twistor in the electromagnetic field or electromagnetised aether (=charged and in motion aether) which subtracts heat energy from aether and converts it to kinetic, in other words electric current. Or maybe tow opposite twisters if it is utilized two or three coils and according to their placement and clockwise or counterclockwise orientation of the turns of the coil. This is similar to the air-twisters (tornados) that as the air is moving in their conical section, is expanding, the temperature drops, air-heat is converted to kinetic energy and the twister motion is preserved. In aether the aether temperature is proportional to the scalar gravitational potential  φ, and thus we may say that the energy is extracted from the potential energy of the gravitational field. Of course according to our standard knowledge of the gravitational field this seems impossible, but on the other hand it seems that we know only 4/10 or 6/10 of what fully is the gravitational field. See e.g. 
http://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.gr/
or 
http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.pdf
http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/12_laws_of_physics.doc

The double coil
How the double coil is made:
A PVC tube (Cylinder) for the coils, of  diameter 5 cm , length 32 cm
2 sockets at the two circular ends of the tube to connect the wires from the rest of the circuit.
The tube  has a long coil on its surface of 108 turns, that occupies about 23 cm length of the tube. The wire for this coil is not more than 30 m, 1.5 square mm (mm^2) cross-section, insulated.
It has also a short coil of only 6 turns, of 2.5 square mm (mm^2) insulated wire.
The short coil of 6 turns is kept in a small distance (not in contact) from the long coil of the many turns, as in the pictures, by plastic rods or tubes and glue.
The coils are of air core.
 Inside the PVC tube of the coils, there is a copper tube of diameter 12 mm, and length 40 cm , and inside it a copper rod of diameter 8 mm, and length 40 cm. Both are electrically connected, but it seems better if they are also firmly fitted between them. These two are grounded according to the circuit diagram.

My impression is that as the current is propagating in the long-fine and short-coarse coil, the turning orientation is both counterclockwise or both clockwise, but when putting the two coils   geometrically on the cylinder, it would be of opposite turning orientation. Similarly for three coils as in the earlier versions, along the current path, my impression is that it is clockwise (22 turns)/counterclockwise (84 turns) /counterclockwise (6 turns). The next video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVfW1yUqTo shows also
that the third grounding of the lamps is connected in between the 84 turns coil and 6 turns coil, something that J.L. Naudin does not have in his circuit-diagram. (http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/1791/imageknr.jpg)




Here is a diagram of the long coil

 And a picture of the double coil what is made




The spark gap
In the version v3.2 the spak gap was from two rods of tungsten. ( air gap 0.9 mm)  

But in version v.3.3 it was improved to be the one rod of the spark gap from copper and the other from carbon, which makes the spark gap silent during discharges, and reduces input power by 55 watts according to one of the friends that replicated it.
        It seems that it is important to construct a spar-gap so that it is easy to change significantly the distance of the two poles by the hand. The distance defines also the frequency of the current in the circuit. The other variable factor that defines also the frequency is the internal resistance of the lamps or other load that is put to test. For example it does not seem a good idea to utilize a car spark plug that has fixed distance. In an amateurs video I watched that he claimed that 0.9 mm distance was too small, and in his circuit it worked only at distance of some 2-3 centimeters (lower frequency). So it is important to be able to play with the distance of the spark-gap.


Here are some photos








The Grounding

The input power

A microwave oven transformer (MOT) of 800 watts.
DCP-M Y 5591 MX Class 200
2400 volts 1710 VA 3.28 V AC  (the 3.28 v coil is not used)
The input current is 220 volts AC, 50 Hz
The output of the tranformer is AC 2000 volts
Here is a diagram of the input power


Here is the full digram 





The device is tested here with 

14 halogen lamps 150 watts 220 volts.
(with  surge arrestors  each lamp  EPCOS 230 volts, to protect them from burning their tungsten filaments)

Here is a diagram of the output


Here is the the list of the parts mentioned above

Central Circuit


The double coil

The diode HV 05-12  F04 (Later constructors have experimented with different diodes, so that the diode   remains cool)

The spark gap ( air gap 0.9 mm) (Both rods of the spark gap from tungsten. Later constructors have put the one rod of the spark gap from copper and the other from carbon, which makes the spark gap silent during discharges, and reduces input power by 55 watts)

The capacitor HV 1μF 2000V AC

The resistance  10 M Ohms  Internal (1 W )



In the above circuit circulates about 2000 Volts AC.

It seems, according to a video below, that the frequency of the circuit is at the range of 
1-1.2 MHerz

The Double coil




A PVC tube (Cylinder) for the coils, of  diameter 5 cm , length 32 cm

2 sockets at the two circular ends of the tube to connect the wires from the rest of the circuit.

The tube  has a long coil on its surface of 108 turns, that occupies about 23 cm length of the tube. The wire for this coil is not more than 30 m, 1.5 square mm (mm^2) cross-section, insulated.

It has also a short coil of only 6 turns, of 2.5 square mm (mm^2) insulated wire.

The short coil of 6 turns is kept in a small distance (not in contact) from the long coil of the many turns, as in the pictures, by plastic rods or tubes and glue.

The coils are of air core.



Inside the PVC tube of the coils, there is a copper tube of diameter 12 mm, and length 40 cm , and inside it a copper rod of diameter 8 mm, and length 40 cm. Both are electrically connected, but it seems better if they are also firmly fitted between them. These two are grounded according to the circuit diagram.


My impression is that as the current is propagating in the long-fine and short-coarse coil, the turning orientation is both counterclockwise or both clockwise, but when putting the two coils   geometrically on the cylinder, it would be of opposite turning orientation. Similarly for three coils as in the earlier versions, along the current path, my impression is that it is clockwise (22 turns)/counterclockwise (84 turns) /counterclockwise (6 turns). The next video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVfW1yUqTo shows also
that the third grounding of the lamps is connected in between the 84 turns coil and 6 turns coil, something that J.L. Naudin does not have in his circuit-diagram. (http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/1791/imageknr.jpg) 



The input power




A microwave oven transformer of 800 watts.

DCP-M Y 5591 MX Class 200

2400 volts 1710 VA 3.28 V AC  (the 3.28 v coil is not used)

The input current is 220 volts AC, 50 Hz

The output is AC 2000 volts



The output charge


5 halogen lamps 150 watts 220 volts.

(with  surge arrestors  each lamp  EPCOS 230 volts, to protect them from burning thei tungsten filaments)

In the current versionof the device, the 2,000 volts output, is send to the halogen  lamps. But if we want to send the output to ordinary devices, then we must use an additional transformer to step down the 2,000 volts to 220 volts of an ordinary home appliance. 


Off course any necessary wires, sockets , groundings, box or wooden table etc

The list parts as mentioned by J.L Naudin is


The measurements of the input-output power by J-L. Naudin are here


The measurements of the relation of luminosity of the lamps with the power is here 



Other things that must me taken care, according to 10-15 other friends who reproduced versions 3.2,, 3.3 or earlier versions are

1) Monitor the temperature of the various parts,like input transformer MOT, diode, and lamps, and substitute them with different specifications to keep them cool
2) Be sure to have the spark gap silent
3) Close all house appliances like TV, radio etc to prevent them from being burned.
4) Some suggest high resistance test charges instead of lamps.
5) Be sure to have the grounding with watered soil so as to make it more efficient.

A video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aOvuQweJsV8


Overall photo of the power and luminocity measurements







What the say other people that have constructed replications and variations around the world.




Here are some reports of other people that have replicated the device. Notice that some of them, have replicated the earlier versions , which had a third coil on the tube.

(To see all these reports together with their photos go to the link
http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/replications.htm#15 )
# 1 - June 9, 2010 - Kapagen replication by dragon
I've made several attempts with different coils and this is one of the better ones. The whole thing is Tesla basics as you can see in the diagram of the circuit. The picture's show it running a small 40 watt bulb at around 7 watts of input, the variac is set at around 50 volts. The NST is a 120V input with a 6500 volt .02 amp output. I have 2 earth grounds on this one but the second doesn't seem to add anything and can be removed without changing the light intensity or input requirement. One is required.

I've found by playing with various coils and bulbs it's not so much the wattage of the bulb in as much as the resistance of the bulb or bulbs. I have no real way of measuring the output at a wattage level, no claims are being made.... just an interesting experiment.
# 2 - June 9, 2010 - Kapagen successful replication v1.0 by romerouk
I am using 260w in the system and output is at least 500w.The bulbs are more than fully powered. After few more attempts I have destroyed 2 of them. I will have to get some more bulbs tommorow and see how many I can connect and still keep full brightness.I tryed to measure voltage across one bulb and it shows 335v-ac but all my meters are digital and I am sure it is not right.I need to get some analogic multimeters to find the amps and volts at the output.Few minutes ago I have started the system using DC to power the system an now I can see that DC is the only way to keep the system running for longer period of time.Using ac the spark gap becomes very hot as with dc it is much better.Also having a capacitor 90.02mf) connected in parallel with the load, keeps the flickering under control. I hope the picture attached will make all understand the basic of it.
# 3 - June 10, 2010 - Kapagen replication v1.1 and 1.2 by romerouk
I have posted another 2 video-clips testing circuit with high voltage AC then using DC as power source. 
...
I am in UK, using 240vac. Every bulb is 100w and I have connected 9x100w. Sorry I forgot to show that in the video... I will do it next time.
I get around 1.6amp using AC to power the system but when I use DC it drops to around 1.15.
...
tube = 5.5cm/140cm - wire 4mm stranded except the big coil = 10mm stranded MOT I have no information about it. the tube is PVC 5mm thick
One thing I found is that you need both earth connections directly to the ground and about 10m distance. I didn't try longer distance as I don't have more lenght in the garden.In my first attempt I had one earth was comming from the water supply and the other one from a copper pipe I fixed in the ground.That showed me 2.3 amps for 500w load, then I have fixed another copper pipe in the ground at 10 m distance and I got about 1.6a for 900w load.MOT stays just a little bit warm in my case, maybe you have a defective MOT,run it without anything connected to see if it still gets hot, check capacitor value, if it is too high might create the problems you have.Not recommended to start the device inside the house as it will interfere with all electrical equipment, it does in my case, I have almost destroyed the tv, running the device in the garden.It is a lot of radio waves generated by the device and this is another problem at the moment.Turn off all electrical appliances in the house while testing.
Kapanadze replication v1.1 used 1.7A X 240ac = 408 watts input
Kapanadze replication v1.2 used 1.16A X 240ac = 281 watts input 
# 4 - June 11, 2010 - Kapagen replication by callanan
Not as good as a variac although much smaller. It's a 1200W AC power controller or lamp dimmer. Not very clean or linear on a transformer but at least gives some means of power control. Some is better then none...http://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=AA0346&keywords=controller&form=KEYWORD 

I am using two seperate grounds spikes and not the house ground.

# 5 - June 11, 2010 - Kapagen replication by retrod
Here is my first attempt, so don't laugh . I used a large variac on the 120vac input to the MOT (not shown). I had to work in the basement indoors so I used a copper water pipe feed for one ground and an iron floor drain pipe that leads outside & underground for the second. The spark gap is a non resistor sparkplug with a vice grip for a heat sink. The lamp is a 200watt 120 volt. I used the DC circuit with a small HV cap.
First results:
MOT gets very warm and the 20amp mains circuit breaker trips after 15 seconds of operation. Spark gap is electric blue, not violet. Please be careful with this circuit the voltages present are indeed dangerous.

Dave
# 6 - June 12, 2010 - Kapagen replication by retrod
Second attempt. After this mornings smoke test I almost gave up. Then there were some encouraging posts and advice. Here is some progress to report. I noticed on my set-up it works much better with high resistance loads. I started with two 40w light bulbs in series and then thought to try fluro tubes. I am up to six tubes in series with the two original 40w lamps. All the fluro tubes were removed from service a year or more ago as dim or non lighting. It reminds me of when many of us were adding LED's in series working with Dr. Stifflers SEC, what fun!
I have no way right now to measure input current. The voltage out of the variac is 90 volts. The spark has become very quiet with this load. I may post a short video on youtube later.
# 7 - June 15, 2010 - Kapagen replication by woopy
Hello romero and all

OK i am almost ready for a first test. I did the coil exactly as Romero that is 84 turns plus 22 turns plus 6 big turns.the coil 1 and 2 have the same stranded wire (blue) and for the big coil (green and yellow) there is 7 strand of plain copper, the center is made with 4 stranded copper and something torsaded for connection to one ground line, plus the main blue wire connection to the spark gap. the mot is rated 700 watts. I will use it directly (without the cap and diode for a first test. What do you think ? Or can i use the MO cap (0.95 micro farad and 2100 volts) and HV diode.?

I will ground it with 2 ground line conducting to 2 galvanised steel bar going 1 meter deep in the ground. and separated about 15 meter. I intend to use a wire with 3 time 1.5 mm2 bounded ,for the ground lines . I intend to begin with a halogen 500 watts what do you think ?

If it works, i will post the pictures of the construction of the coil step by step.

good luck at all

Laurent
# 8 - June 16, 2010 - Kapagen replication by retrod
Some numbers & a video.  

MOT  is a OBJY2
Input Voltage : 120vac
Input current : Measured at output of variac 4.0 amps avg
Load: Six 200w 120v Lamps
Earth Grounds : First: 200ft iron pipe (water well). Second: 10 ft driven rod, copper clad  
Spark Gap : Champion J-14 with neo magnet attached
Air temperature was 68 degrees Fahrenheit
MOT Temp at start 84 F
MOT Temp at end 107 F
Run time approx 4.5 minutes
# 9 - June 16, 2010 - Kapagen replication by woopy
Hi all

the rain stopped shortly , and could not prevent me to have a second test.

Took all precaution as per Stefan and 3,2,1 go

yaouuh it works very fine. The bank directly connected to the grid does simply no light at all, but with the Kapagen it is near full brightness. i have AC current , no cap at all. I did not make any measure but the grid fuse did not even break. another thing i have a radio on at 10 meters from the kapagen and nothing , no grrrrrbbrrkkkkkk, at all in the radio.

OK and the rain comes again

hope that tomorrow it will be better weather to make some measurements.

just for info the bank as a resistance of 400 ohm. when i connect the bank to the grid, my clampmeter shows 130 ma at 230 volts AC just another thing the bank was on and stopped only when i switched off. but when i tried to take the measre of resistance it was impossible. Than i checked the bulb and one was broken. I mean it seems that i probably had the arc in the bulb which make the bulb on even if the tungsten filament is broken. What do you think?

good luck at all

Laurent
# 10 - June 21, 2010 - Kapagen successful replication by Robert
Dear Mr. Naudin,

Good news! 

I got 1800W out and the MOT stays cold even the inlet power meter indicates 800W. I think that’s a real sign of OU. I have 2x150W halogen + 18x 100W bulbs (fully bright) and all serial. If I would have more lamps I think they would shine fully too.
I observed that with the 1N5408 diode didn’t work – but with the BY255 it works very well – just they get hot, so I add cooler.
I don’t know way you changed the coil setup but with the coil relation 22 – 84 – 6 its working quite well.

Many thanks and br.

Robert
# 11 - June 23, 2010 - Kapagen successful replication by Juju
Hi Guys! 
I made a video of my setup, is my first one!

i putted some lamps of 60w others of 100w, all in series with a fan/ventilator of 100W... i putted the fan in the end of the sequence going to ground, because it haves a capacitor of 230V, i was affraid it can blow up if it takes all the primary voltage! 2 lamps in the video are not lighting well, but i think it was some problem with them!

this thing can feed all type of devices, not only lamps!
and it is not so spooky as at seems, when the adrenaline goes up, the fear fades! spectacular! 
my output dont work well with dc, as you can see, dont used any caps!
dont took measurements because my DMM cannot read alternate current, only dc...
# 12 - June 25, 2010 - Kapagen successful replication by TomB-455
Dear Mr Naudin,

I have tried to replicate your coil and it works!

most of the setup is the same as yours, m.o.t. 800 watt, in dc mode. 10x150 wats halo-bulbs fully bright!!
i checkt my variac (but didn't put it on camera) and it was at 165 volts!!!
exept for the 23ccw turns on the entrance of the coil, those whre nessecery to reduce the input current.
the pictures are folowing soon. i did make a video though.. ;)

best regards,

TomB-455
# 15 - July 2nd, 2010 - Kapagen successful replication by don
Hi Mr. Naudin

The best (lowest input power) I could get was 707 Watts lighting 18 x 100 watt light bulbs without using a variac. It used 570 watts to light 9 of the 100 watt light bulbs.
I measured my power usage with a Kill-O-Meter connect to Mains over 30 feet away from my device.
When I first turned my Kapagen on it used over 1100 watts and the lights were approximately 50-60% bright. After playing with this for a week I got the power usage down to 707 Watts and the lights were at least 90% bright. I did this comparison by having one 100 watt light bulb connected to Mains sitting next to one of my light bulbs from my Kapagen. I agree it's not scientific but it was good enough for me to tell the difference.
I did find that dimmer switches and amp restrictors used more power then they were worth so I removed my amp restrictor.

But the most important thing I found was that the ground rods/connections/Earth was the biggest factor in lowering my power usage. I replaced my copper tube with construction grade grounding rods, applied water to the ground around my ground rods. In my area there is 6-12" of top soil and then under that it's all sand. Sand doesn't hold water very well. 

Using Carbon rod and Copper for the spark gap lowered my input power usage by 55 watts.


More videos and constructors of Kapanadze 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6hVasVR7A
http://pesn.com/2013/04/13/9602295_Demos_by_Fabrice-Andre_Refuge7/ 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVfW1yUqTo

Here are more videos also outside the instructions of the J-L Naudin laboratory.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-QvHSyHOuQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atlnVNy0IDE


Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Wednesday 25 January 2012

1. Some worthy links for alternative cheap and clean ubiquitous renewable energy, sustained by solar infrared radiation energy.





       The next are some interesting videos and links 
       for the  emergence during 20th and 21ts century of 
       the new clean energy model    


0) I believe that cheap and clean ubiquitous renewable energy (c.u.r.e.) is where the new energy model converges from where it is right now. Right now the natural gas seems to be the core of the development, which is not renewable energy. On the other hand solar, and wind renewable energy seem still expensive. It may take 10, 20,30, or 50 years to reach the point  where renewable energy will be much cheaper than natural gas, nuclear and oil. But even so, a present time slower development of cheap renewable ubiquitous energy has to  develop and be studied. The best storage of the renewable energy seems to be Hydrogen. And there is much innovation right now on the methods of production of hydrogen.


The shift to the new 21st century energy model, is not simply some new technology or inventions it requires a deeper shift of our habitual consciousness and mental conceptions, about what is and how is the physical material reality. 
Maybe it will not be possible to explain the source of this renewable energy in full University formal mathematical mode before the next happen
1) Accept  the material reality of the electromagnetic and gravitational field as consisting of  permanent particles  transcendentally finer than protons , neutrons electrons. The current concept of the classical field as "energy in empty space" is inadequate. We are acustomed to believe that the energy of the electromagnetic and gravitational field is only so much as we give it by the solid material bodies that "create"  it. Therefore we think that it could not be possible to extract more than what we have already given....But it seems that the physical reality is different and deeper. The energy of the electromagnetic and gravitational field is much more than what we give by material solid bodies, which do not "create" it but simply  shape it. 
2) Reformulate the J. C. Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism for the laboratory scale electromagnetic field.
3) Reformulate the Newtonian and A. Einstein's concepts and equations of the gravitational field.
4) The 1), 2), 3) together with the addition of the dynamic (aether-dynamic) and not only the static part of the new universal attraction (gravitation) , essentially make a new macroscopic (laboratory scale) unified field theory (aether-field). 

Obviously this great change may mean 1-2 new lucky Nobel prize winners. 

The next are classical and current physics assumptions, that I believe, that in the new millenium physics, they will be proven wrong.

1) The inertial mass of bodies ( of constant amount of molecular matter) at low speed (non-relativistic) cannot be decreased below the inertia of the rest mass. 
2) All matter starts with protons, neutrons, electrons. In other words, there are not smaller permanent particles (Quantum particles are excluded as they are not permanent) 
3) Nothing goes faster than photons 
4) All macroscopic electromagnetic interactions are described with the linear equations of Maxwell. 
5) All forces acting on laboratory macroscopic objects at low speed (non-relativistic) are of the next 5 types a) Inertial, b) by contact with other material bodies made from protons, neutrons, electrons, c) Newtonian gravitation forces d) Maxwell's electromagnetic forces e) no other type of forces.
The more correct attitude is that
1) It is possible under special conditions to have radical decrease of the inertia of the rest mass of a body in slow motion
2) Aether is a 2nd material reality made from permanent particles of positive negative and neutral charge, transcendentally finer than protons-neutrons-electrons and the electromagnetic and gravitational field is aspects of the functions of aether.
3) To say than nothing goes faster than light in aether, is like saying than no airplane can go faster than the sound, in air.
4) The linear Maxwell equations of electromagnetism are correct only for a limited realm of experiments those discovered at the end of the 19th century, not all laboratory scale experiments that we now know. They need revision, and their correct version include parameters of gravitation too, and are non-linear.
5) Besides, inertial forces, classical electromagnetic forces and Newtonian and Einsteinian gravitational forces, and forces by contact of bodies,  exist also a 5th type of macroscopic laboratory scale forces on bodies from the rest of the gravitational field that we do not know. (In underground physics, this unknown field is called anti-gravity or the classical gravity is called aether-statics and this field, aether-dynamic field of the neutral aether) 


Where in particular classical laboratoty electromagnetism is wrong:
1) Moving charges (current) create in a dynamic way vector electromagnetic potential  and electric field, which CANNOT be derived from the Coulobs law after superimposing the motion. In particular accelerating charge is producing electric field which cannot be derived simply from the Maxwell equations by the changing magnetic field of the moving charge. 
2) For fast moving (e.g. rotating) magnets, the magnetic field seazes to be conservative! 
Rarely in fluid dynamics the field of rotations (curl) of a fluid is conservative! The fact that for static magnets it is at a very good aproximation conservative, does not mean that in general and at all possible states, that the magetic field is concervative. 



A GENERAL PERSPECTIVE FOR THE EXPLANATION OF ALMOST ALL 
"FREE-ENERGY" or "G-SOLAR ENERGY" DEVICES AND THE ROLE OF INFRARED SOLAR RADIATION

Here is a perspective for a scientific explanation of almost all free-energy devices. The difficulty is not in the complication of the device, but in our deeper change of our paradeigm of the physical reality. We think that all material physical reality starts with the triad of particles of protons-neutrons-electrons that create the elements of the periodic system, the molecules and all the rest. But the electromagnetic and gravitational field escape from this paradeigm, although we prove that they have momentum density, inertia and energy. They are not made from protons-neutrons-electrons, although the seem to be a material reality. In the Universities we think of them as "Empty space" where energy propagates. It is the wrong paradeigm. The correct paradeigm is that ( and it is obvious to me) these two fields are aspects of a finer material resolution and density that again consists of particles. Of course, as these particles are not the protons-neutrons-electrons we might call them micro-prontons/micro-neutrons/micro-electrons, and have to be permanent. All quantum particles are excluded as they are not permanent.  We could call it 2nd material density or resolution. In the past centuries it was called aether (in the 20 century a discredited term).
For the sake of clarity let us give an example. Let as imagine the picture of the atom of hydrogen. A proton in the nucleus and an electron randomly rotating in a probabilistic orbital around it. How the new paradeigm of an additional 2nd layer of the physical reality would change it? Simply we would  consider the space between the electron and the protons not as " empty space" but we would assume a vast number of transcendentally finer particles, say 10^35 times smaller than the electron, that although consisting of positive, neutral and negative, in total density are neutral, and make the " hidden standing waves " that affect the quantum random motion of the electron.These aetherorn-particles are as perament as the proton. 

As long as we think of it as "empty space" there is no way we can account for the source of free-energy. But if we conceive it as a 2nd finer material layer, then all become enlightened. We are acustomed to believe that the energy of the electromagnetic and gravitational field is only so much as we give it by the solid material bodies that "create"  it. Therefore we think that it could not be possible to extract more than what we have already given....But it seems that the physical reality is different and deeper. The energy of the electromagnetic and gravitational field is much more than what we give by material solid bodies, which do not "create" it but simply  shape it. Of course this is a major change in the Academic Physics. It would require 1) Re-writing the Maxwell equation of electomagnetism 2) Re-writing the equations of Newtonian and Eisteinian gravitation. And this might mean 2 nobel prices to two lucky new University professors in Physics. Puting aside this difficulty in social evolution, we may anticipate the general explanation. Almost all free-energy devices create at least one  asymmetric small tornado in the electromagnetised aether (=chaged aether and in motion). (Some times two oposite rotating such small tornados) Except of the gravity wheels that they do so, not in the charged aether(=electromagnetised aether), but in the neutral aether. And from the atmospheric analogue of conical tornados we know that as the air is moving in spiral from the narrow section to the wide section, the air expands, the temperature drops ,heat energy is extracted and converted to kinetic energy that sustains the tornado. Similarly with the electromagnetised (or neutral ) aether, only that here the aether temperature seems to be proportional to the scalar gravitational potential φ, thus we can say also that the energy is extracted from the potential energy of the gravitational field. This classically seems impossible for the gravitational field, but on the other hand we know only the 3/10 to 6/10 of what is really the gravitational field. For more on this line of thought see the Bloghttp://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.gr/2012/04/1-12-new-laws-of-millenium-physics.html

http://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.gr/2012/10/20-from-lancaster-lecture.html

which originated from an invitation of the author by the British Aerospace at the University Of Lancaster
As a final remark, we should point-out that more modern scientific approaches, tend to realise earth (and any planet, or celestial bodies like the moon, and even the stars like the sun) as hollow spherical shells rather than dense material spheres, and their gravitation due to aether-heat as comming mainly not from the presence of the matter of the planet, but rather from the infrared solar radiation which creates aether-heat in a phenomenon like the "green-house-effect" in  hollow balls. From this perspective the "free-energy" of various inventions is mainly a form of stored solar energy  , in the gravitational and electromagnetic field ("G-solar energy" where G is for  Gravitation ), or rather in general in the aether-field (thus aether-Solar energy).Alternative term Aether-Heat or 2nd-layer material heat.

I quote here from a Blog that I like to read:
........................................................

The necessary change of our paradigm and beliefs about the material physical Reality: 

Our perception and experience of the physical reality depends mainly on our beliefs and concepts about the physical reality, our state of development of our planetary civilization and external to humanity constraints. We must not forget it. We must not be sure that all there is to know about physical reality is all that we already know. 
The more we evolve as civilization and individual consciousness the larger and deeper the physical reality becomes. 
Whole new worlds of deeper physical reality are waiting for us, as we advance our consciousness and spiritual and scientific understanding. And together with these worlds, new scientific knowledge, new inventions, and new abilities for a  longer and better quality inner and outer life.

As an example: 
We are accustomed to thing that all the material reality starts from the triad of protons, neutrons and electrons. Then atoms are shaped, the periodic system of elements, molecules, and inorganic compounds, with their energies, then the  inorganic world, then the world of plans and then the world of animals . We also tend to think that beyond this "tree of material creation" of the material physical reality, no other material physical reality exists but emptiness and vacuum.

 As long as we hold to the above belief, we may miss important inventions, sources of renewable energy and abilities for medical cure. Simply because we narrow the true deepness of the material physical reality, and blind our practice about our true abilities by interacting , studying and creating rational sane scientific knowledge about deeper material reality.

The very existence of the electromagnetic and gravitational field, with their momentum, and  inertia mass, as scientists know it, betrays the above belief about of emptiness and vacuum beyond the classical atoms. Maybe  we should enhance the above 1st "tree of material creation" of the accepted material reality with a second additional and finer "tree of material creation" that includes the material reality of the electromagnetic , gravitational field, or what was called in older centuries "aether" and in which the 1st "tree of material creation" or 20th century material reality, is embedded and interacts. If we do that, then we might discover an abundance of ways to produce cheap, clean ubiquitous renewable energy, and cure many so far incurable diseases.  Maybe so as to discover the macroscopic unifying aether-field of electromagnetism and universal attraction that will reveal new forms of renewable energy, we might need also learn more  how to unify the sexual eroticism and  love. 
This enhancement of both our paradigm of what is physical material reality and also experience of the physical material reality, depends on advancing our individual consciousness, improve our values,  and the civilizations practice. 


........................................................

In the past the inventions and inventors of free-energy have been suppressed by some alien intention crypto-piracy of planetary scale. The rumours say that: 


The manipulation from the civilizations from the constallations of Orion, Dracon, Sirius B is done mainly through the creation of a planetary scale crypto-piracy and coup regime that jeopardizes democratic governments , and highjack the power of public states. 

It seems that this crypto-piracy becomes the vehicle of the final alien monstrous intention of destroying the majority of the humanity, in a way that it seems as if humanity itself destroyed itself through neglecting of the environment, over-population aggressiveness, financial over-debt etc. so that the remaining humanity that will be ....the Aryan race, is eventually enslaved by the above reptilian races. 

This crypto-piracy has neo-Nazi philosophy, and some of the crimes so far are:
1) Creation and spread of the aids virus
2) Murdering of the Kennedy's
3) Deception of public by the creation and use of clones for Rockefeller and Carter, and some other public figures.
(It seems that some public figures are not real anymore are already murdered, and their clones function instead of the original, which are totally controlled by the crypto-piracy. This explains the common expressed feeling by now, of millions of people, that many public figures turn "mysteriously" against the true interest of their voters, and serve essentially malevolent will for humanity, just after the are elected and get in power.)
4) Setup and lock of the monetary-banking system so as to lead to over-debt, increased economic differences and non-solvency
5) Murdering of free-energy inventors
6) Abduction of children to become laboratory experiment animals or food to monsters
etc
For more about that see http://www.galacticlife.blogspot.gr

See also the next relevant video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL7uFTKUK_U


A very brave and remarkably successful, for one only man, working for the resolution of the  global planetary issues of the current state of humanity was the  comprehensive anticipatory design scientist Buckminster Fuller (1895-1983). 
He was  very good example of the psychology of the planetary scale human being, in the service of the totality of humanity and the planet. 
Some of his renewable energy philosophy is found in the global energy network (grid) of linking renewable energy production in the planet.


Preliminary Remark about the links of free-energy devices:
The links of free-energy devices are of three types
a) Genuine valuable inventions
b) On purpose misinformation with fake free-energy devices (from ill-purposed  groups)
c) Failure inventions that the "inventor" cannot or does not want to admit it.
We try as much as possible to avoid the types b) and c). 
Sometimes the inventor has the wrong explanation of why his device works and gives extra energy, or he has redundant parts in his device. Still his overall invention might be a valuable experimental discovery, for the coming developments in physics and engineering.


1) A site with almost all the history of free-energy (=cheap and clean  renewable energy which is ubiquitous, C.U.R.E. the planet from CO2.  Most of the arcived inventions, extract energy from the heat of aether), is the next. But most of these  20th century models of generators are both too complicated and too expensive to build for a house or village.  I recommend it only for reviewing the history not utilizing devices.


An open source online University dedicated to free energy:

On air cars and  "Self-Running Ambient Air Heat Engines"   that substract heat from the atmospheric air and run the engine while refilling the used compressed air from the tank if there is at all one, here

http://www.aircaraccess.com/
Article: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6UgV3gVmd0
(The above video  is refering among others to the next inventors
J. Newman (where output power/input power= some thousands)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMYo1QlvK5g
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/Inventors/JosephNewman/
Norman  Wootan (where output power/input power=256)
http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/1mra.htm
Reidar Finsrud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
http://www.galleri-finsrud.no/
Aldo Costa gravity wheel
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Aldo_Costa's_Gravity_Motor
Chas Campbell gravity wheel (where output power/input power= up to 10)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qyvX9j5i3U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Co4kFG4cJMk&playnext=1&list=PLBC24FF7496F13B7F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98aiISB2DNw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLa6rjF541Q
 http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/02/10/how-to-build-chas-campbells-gravitational-engine/#.UOREwOS6eVo
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Chas_Campbell_Generator 
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/LTseung.pdf
)

Remark about gravity wheels: Mostly the inability to understand and explain the gravity wheels , based on the traditional university classical physics, is due to the implicit  hypothesis that a) The inertial rest mass is always unchanged and cannot be decreased more than the rest inertial mass  during the low speed (non-relativistic) motion b) It is impossible to extract energy from the potential energy of the gravitational field. c)  All forces acting on laboratory macroscopic objects at low speed (non-relativistic) are of the next 5 types 1) Inertial, 2) by contact with other material bodies made from protons, neutrons, electrons, 3) Newtonian gravitation forces 4) Maxwell's electromagnetic forces 5) no other type of forces. Nevertheless we really know only about 3/10 to 6/10 of what truly is the gravitational field and inertia. And the above three hypotheses may turn out both wrong, with appropriate experiments and theory.)

Also a more modern comprehensive site


Of course we should not forget Tesla that one century ago, had made already free-energy devices

Mini Tesla Coil
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGk3O-zg2E8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDZnCOLZ394
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2PrPHgOy04

Tesla flying disc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haurcUcDiiA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0z3pEeYDEw

The movie about Tesla

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZkkHhyWFus

Here is a very good video presenting free-enegy inventions from the time of N. Tesla till today, an impressive list of remarkable inventors, very well presented, and covering a great range of the spectrum of aether  free-energy  from magets, sparks and discharges,  plasma states of matter, and cold fusion. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMhAIdqH0Cs

2) The next site is the most scientifically serious approach that I have found in the web for free-energy (=cheap renewable energy, that in most of the cases it is from the heat of aether). It is by Jean-Louis Naudin (France). Nevertheless he just builds in his laboratory  the devices makes measurements and confirms or not the claims, publishing the results. The academic science cannot for the time being cover and explain free-energy (=cheap and clean ubiquitous renewable enerrgy). For the academic science to do so it must a) Re-write the Maxwell's equations of classical electromagnetism b) Re-write the equations of gravitation of Einstein. Both might mean 2 Nobel prizes for 2 lucky physicists.




3) In the previous site of Jean-Louis Naudin there is probably the cheapest (100$-200$) and easiest to construct (and power for free by 1kw your house)  free-energy generator (without moving parts, only 2-3 coils. It extracts through a vortex created by the coils in the electromagnetised aether , the heat of aether), a discovering-invention (2010)  by the Russian  (Georgia) Tariel Kapanadze (where output power/input power=about 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6hVasVR7AI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVfW1yUqTo



4) The next site is mainly a recent discussion-forums site for free energy (=cheap and clean unibiquitous renewable energy=c.u.r.e. Again most of the inventions extract energy from the heat of aether. And the heat of aether is related to the potential energy of the gravitational field.).  Not all the discussions there are good or worthy.Its best feature is that it organizes competitions with money prizes and honors for the best free inventions (called there overunity devices, in the sense that the performance is above unity: Output energy exceeds the accountable known input energy. The rest incoming energy is not known or accountable).
     So free-energy(=cheap ubiquitous  renewable energy) comes now with third-party assessments , refereeing etc



See also the link about the free-energy congress 2011 at Barcelona Spain.


5) 

The next document is from  a lecture in the Lancaster University for free-energy (=cheap and clean ubiquitous renewable energy), (only for trained academic physicists. It explains why the inventions of free energy, are impossible according to the academic mathematical predictions of the equations of electromagnetism and gravitation.  It explains that matter does not start from the protons , electrons and neutrons, but also the classical fields of electromagnetism and gravitation is a finer resolution , density and layer of material reality (aether). It suggest a unification and enhancement of these two fields through the reality of aether, and relates the potentials of the electromagnetic field and gravitational field with gaseous parameters of aether. Most of the inventions of free-energy are explained as energy extraction from the heat of aether, either in neutral state [e.g. gravitational field] or in electromagnetised  aether [=charged aether and in motion]). 

http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.pdf



Also from the same author a simpler text about "The 12 laws of the new millennium physics" 
 It simply points-out where the classical academic physics approach fails so as to explain the free-energy (=cheap renewable energy).  


6) The next links are not intented so as to take plans to construct any free-energy (=clean ubiquitous renewable energy, C.U.R.E.) device but simply to be aware of the best success and companies in this new energy-model




a) The water car my Stan Meyer.

It is based on the renewable energy property of oxydrogen (HHO) when burned upon metals (and ceramics) to release more  thermal energy, than the energy given to make the electrolysis of water and produced the HHO. Most probably this energy too is extracted from the heat of aether at an atomic level. In addition Stan Meyer has invented an electrolysis without electrolyser, by putting the cylindrical electrodes very close 1-2mm, and exercising square impulse electricity at an optimal frequency experimentally found for the device. His electrolysis gives HHO with 7 times more stored energy that the energy given for the electrolysis. Most probably this energy too is extracted from the heat of aether at an atomic level at the ions H+ and HO- .


         We may mention here the findings of Tadahiko Mizuno (Hokkaido University) of             excess  heat at high voltage-electrolysis of water, published  at the Japanese Journal of applied   physics (see e.g. http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf) 
      Academic physics due to the lack of understanding of the material reality of the electromagnetic field and gravitational field (aether) , is forced to assume that the excess energy is from the annihilation of some particles from the atoms of water. But it is by far more probable that the excess energy is from tiny vortexes or twisters of aether during the high voltage electrolysis that extract energy from the heat of aether.
Besides, the atom itself is the best "free-energy" generator or motor, or energy-transformer between the material level of aether from the one side , and the other side the classical material level made from protons, neutrons, electrons.  

Here is more cases of how water can become a medium of extracting aether heat, in extreme water-stress or electrolysis etc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_6Ng_xllrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0yu9k_Nw3A&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGvhrvCnXY8&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oGyUujgST0&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7c002D1D80&feature=relmfu

        See also the water car of Denny Klein
        

         See also an electric car utilizing energy from the heat of the electromagntised aether 
         by  Troy Reed


      b) 
EBM in Hungary: Renewable form of energy from the heat of electromagetised 

aether

It is probably the oldest (20-30 years) factory of free-energy generators in Europe 

(Hungary, with Canadian 

capital) They build installations up to 10 MW, that cost at least 3-times less than 

ordinary electricity from coal ,oil 

or solar panels


Official site

http://www.gammamanager.com/

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Energy_By_Motion_(EBM)

c) In Australia

d) The next is not a 21st century invention of clean ubiquitous renewable energy.

as it is as old as of the 70's or 80's of the 20th century. So it should be together with 

other similar 20    century    inventions, like that of the magetic motors of J. Searl 

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?


v=pUUvhuQtba4&feature=related ), B. DePalma (http://www.envirolink.org/external.html?

www=http%3A//www.depalma.pair.com/&itemid=948&itemname=DePalma%20Institute),  

P.Tewari     (http://www.tewari.org/) or cold   electricity of E. Gray 

(http://www.rexresearch.com/evgray/1gray.htm)


But because of its simplisity and low technology, and because of its use by 

a community, I post it here.

Testatika (also a very simple-primitive generator that extracts energy

 from the heat of electromagnetised aether through the creation and handling of 


 electrostatic electircity . It was  invented by Paul Baumann and was

 used for decades to power the community of Methernitha  in Switzerland

 It  is good also for   eco-communities too):

The testatika is essentially the Wimshurst machine, that is rotated not manually but
with a small electric motor, powered by a battery, at about 30 rotations per minute.
It is two parallel discs rotating at opposite direction. Both have radically metal strips. One has double the number of the other. As they rotate the free-electrons of the metal due to centrifugal forces go to the circumference. So the circumference has more voltage than the centre. So also the circumference of the disc with more radial metal strips compared to the other disc.
The output current is collected with electrodes-brushes that do not touch the discs mainly from the outer circumference of the two discs. It is high voltage continuous current that has to be stepped down to lower voltage and more amperes. The output energy is more than the input energy. So it charges the battery of the motor, and there is surplus energy to power lamps and other devices.
The magnetic field of the opposite rotating discs is mutually repelling.
The air-temperature at the area of the rotating discs is continuously lower compared to the ambient temperature. So part of the free energy is air-heat which is subtracted and converted to current. The rest is from the aether-heat of the expanding magnetic field, and asymmetric aether-micro-tornado which is converted to current.
Because of the easiness to find or buy or construct Wimshurst machines , it is recommended for eco-communities too. It is also highly reliable as it has been used at least for 20-30 powering communities and villages. 
For 1kW the dics must have a radius of about 70 cm, and the one disc must have 16-24 radial metal strips while the other 8-12. 




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimshurst_machine

https://www.google.gr/search?q=wimshurst+generator&hl=el&tbo=u&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ei=F_oMUbKbLsql0QXwioC4Cg&ved=0CDkQsAQ&biw=939&bih=569


ΜΙΤ video about Wimshurst
https://www.google.gr/search?q=wimshurst+generator&hl=el&tbo=u&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ei=F_oMUbKbLsql0QXwioC4Cg&ved=0CDkQsAQ&biw=939&bih=569

How to build a Wimshurts
http://steampunkworkshop.com/how-build-wimshurst-influence-machine-part-1

http://steampunkworkshop.com/how-build-wimshurst-influence-machine-part-1



e) 
In USA : Renewable form of energy from the electromagetised aether


See also the geometry (two 12-star polygones) of the Marko Rodin Coil, that it is know to have significant properties of resonance and energy extraction from the heat of the electromagnetised aether.




7) The next video of a www.ted.com talk , expresses the right philosophy and spirit of free energy (=cheap ubiquitous renewable energy) : When we have free energy (=cheap ubiquitous renewable energy), in any convenient way technology, we are able to desalinate the sea water, to drinkable water, and restore the lost since very ancient times drinkable water abundance of the planet




8) Wonderful application of HHO in heating the home: An HHO home heating Unit which manufactured and sold by 


It is based on the renewable energy property of oxydrogen (HHO) when burned upon metals (and ceramics) to release more  thermal energy, than the energy given to make the electrolysis of water and produced the HHO. Most probably this energy too is extracted from the heat of aether at an atomic level.Most probably this energy  is extracted from the heat of aether at an atomic level.


With 300w consumption of electric power (as a home computer), it produces 3 litters of hydrogen per minute, and creates 28.5 litters per minute hot air at 125 farheneit degrees, that can heat up to 1500 square feet house.
The company also sells detailed plans at 39$ to manufacture yourself the unit which is of law technology: All materials can be found in an ordinary hardware store.
In the detailed plans is also included how to apply it to your car and increase its mileage or decrease the cost of moving it.


9) More remarkable applications can be based  on the renewable energy property of oxyhydrogen or water-gas  (HHO) when burned upon metals (and ceramics) to release more  thermal energy, than the energy given to make the electrolysis of water that produced the HHO.Most probably this energy  is extracted from the heat of aether at an atomic level.
For example we may generate electricity or hydrogen from sea water, or desalinate sea water using no other input tangible fuel, other than the sea water. 

The next list is an example of such a process, based on low technology, e.g. a high school laboratory:

a) Electricity from a battery , applies electrolysis to sea water, to produce HHO
b) The HHO is burned on a classical stove (it is here that the physical reality adds extra energy from the micro-scale of atoms, as HHO is burned on metals) where it is boiled sea water. Alternatively part of HHO is used to extract hydrogen for external to the process uses, by separating it from oxygen. 
c) Part of the steam of the boiling sea water is distilled by cooling the steam , producing pure drinkable distilled water.
d) Part of the steam runs a steam engine (e.g. a Stirling engine or other) that produces electricity. Alternatively cheap renewable energy electricity could be produced by other methods, e.g. as those described in http://jnaudin.free.fr/   , e.g. Kapanadze method with coils. Or alternatively ceap renewable  energy electricity could be produced by methods like combining  the inventions of  the engine and the generator as  in http://www.fuellesspower.com/
e) This electricity is feeding the battery that is used for the electrolysis.

Because of the phases a) and b) (or d)) we have energy gain, so in total the process is self-sustained as far as  energy is concerned.

Obviously margin for efficiency improvements does exist here, and the production power at the initial designs may be limited, but at least it is self-sustained no-fossil fuels, clean energy from CO2 , and also cheap production. 


The site http://www.overunity.com/ mentioned above that organizes competitions gives prizes to inventors of cheap and clean ubiquitous renewable energy. There are already partcipants that have developped energy units that extract renewable energy from the heat of aether through HHO, as energy production units.



The conclusion is that with such simple protocols , we may desalinate the sea water in to drinkable distilled water.  The sea water desalination is probably one of the greatest benevolent planetary scale water projects , together with the lake-creation from rains and it is a vast advantage and a restoration of the drinkable water abundance of the planet. There is no way that we would ever utilize oil to desalinate water. It would cost many trillion dollars. But with such   renewable energy through HHO-burning, we may desalinate the sea water, saving millions of lives every year. We may compare this energy self-sustained simple method with other as mentioned in 7)
Small dry islands of the Mediterranean , and of the  Oceans , can be converted in to green paradises , with such free-energy desalination.



 


 


Posted by at
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)